Teen-brain denial in South Africa; NZ's untold detransition stories; anti-Cass bias in Australia; German docs reject hate smears; judicial activism thwarted in Brazil; pressure for answers in Norway
It seems to me to be obvious that experimenting on children with healthcare that obviously isn’t healthcare but has very sad outcomes is just plain wrong. But then the same people did the same thing with dangerous unproven covid injections. My motto is don’t trust and ask lots of questions.
As always, understand that medicine is a practice, like being a mechanic, lawyer, or beautician.
Sometimes science-based, sometimes not. It took decades for Doctors to treat ulcers as infections, rather than effects of stress or spicy food, even after the science was settled.
Doctors today have decided on what they will do for trans irrespective of science.
Unless punished by law and insurance, they won’t change for another few decades.
Mimicking women is so effective that humans are often entirely deceived by sex mimicry. It needs to be taught to be recognized as deception in school, medicine, law, sports, and politics. Once recognized, then avoided.
In fact, the deception achieved by “ sex mimicking “ is the result of the conscious decision to become offended by truth ( and therefore collude with social activism) rather than to become offended by lies. The expression of the latter choice brings the real risks of being labeled as a transphobic bigot, at best, or suffer significant career retribution at worst ( just ask Jillian Spent) . My point being we are innately “ wired” to recognize the mimicking on just looking and listening, we then decide how to respond. The protagonists ( of gender identity/ fluidity) who are offended by truth, can only be guided by two motives, either misguided/ misplaced compassion, or deliberate social activism , for which there has been no shortage of expression of the latter from , inexplicably, medically trained folk who have nailed there empathetic colors to a mast , one which has been constructed deep in the bowels of gender studies within the social sciences
I agree wholeheartedly in many cases with you, but part of the art of deception is also to induce you to question yourself and make an effort.
It’s less effort and often unconscious, to overlook the deception. You are a student of people clearly and know most people simply accept what they are told.
Sexual mimicry has become so powerful that non-mimics tell People it’s not mimicry.
Classic sort of Emperor’s new clothes, or folie à plusieurs.
If it weren’t terrible in effect it would be humorous. It’s like looking at someone with a beard and saying “no they don’t have a beard”, or someone who was morbidly obese and saying “they are slender.”
It’s training. Some people are trained to reflexively say “that’s a woman” when they see a man, that like other cognitive reflexes, they don’t consider what’s been said l.
If someone is in a hospital bed on life support and half their body removed, they may reflexively say “I’m fine” when posed “how are you.”
“Let’s do lunch”, “I don’t need to write it down,” “No I’m not mad”, “honest politician”, “unbiased media”, “user friendly”. “Open secret”.
“I’m sorry you feel that way”.
Then
“Trans women are women”.
Social-smoothing, status-affirming nonsense.
For some reason my entire family loves nonsense phrases and usually responds in a way which interrupts the script.
“I feel like shit.” “I’m mad as hell.” “If you don’t like it tough shit”, and
“That’s not a woman that a butt-ugly delusional man.”
The ‘identity breakdown’ of transgender adults according to the ‘Williams Institute’ study in the US indicates is that there exists an approximate three-way near-equal split between ‘women’, ‘men’ and ‘binary’. Perhaps the situation is similar in Australia?
This equation is important as there are significantly elevated risk realities associating with the transgender women cohort for two reasons:
A high prevalence of sexually transmitted conditions and criminal activity:
1. Numerous studies confirm that TG women have high prevalence of HIV/AIDS. I cannot find current figures for HIV prevalence in this cohort in Australia however a study in 2018 indicated that the prevalence of HIV among the TG women cohort was 49 times that of the general population. In the United States HIV prevalence is highest among transgender women with recent estimates ranging from 14.1% to 18.8%.
2. I found it difficult to find recent figures for bacterial sexually transmitted diseases in this cohort however a study from 2017 indicated the following prevalences: Chlamydia 10%, Gonorrhoea 8% and Syphilis 3.1%
Criminal Activity:
Transgender women were over six times more likely to be convicted of an offence than female comparators and 18 times more likely to be convicted of a violent offence. Finally, as might be expected, studies imply that gender women exhibit a male-type patterns of criminality.
Dr Anastasia Tomson said: “In testing new agents or existing drugs that have never been applied to TB before, we don’t compare them to a placebo or to non-intervention, because we know it’s unethical. We know that we can’t withhold treatment in the name of building a body of evidence.”
This shows the extreme ignorance of this TransGender Doctor activist.
Of course we would not test a new TB treatment that had not been tested in TB before, in a randomised controlled trial. The new treatment would need to have shown efficacy in Phase 2 (uncontrolled) trials presumably after failure of the known effective treatment prior to progressing to a controlled trial.
This is completely different to medical affirmation, where there is no evidence of efficacy and proven evidence of harm.
You would expect overwhelming efficacy evidence to justify
treatment that causes irreversible body changes plus other risks such as osteoporosis.
But the protagonists can’t even agree on what the efficacy end point is. They have now virtually conceded that it doesn’t improve mental health, so now they say that as long as the patients achieve their wish, that is proof of efficacy.
If this is medicine it is certainly not the medicine I was taught.
It seems to me to be obvious that experimenting on children with healthcare that obviously isn’t healthcare but has very sad outcomes is just plain wrong. But then the same people did the same thing with dangerous unproven covid injections. My motto is don’t trust and ask lots of questions.
As always, understand that medicine is a practice, like being a mechanic, lawyer, or beautician.
Sometimes science-based, sometimes not. It took decades for Doctors to treat ulcers as infections, rather than effects of stress or spicy food, even after the science was settled.
Doctors today have decided on what they will do for trans irrespective of science.
Unless punished by law and insurance, they won’t change for another few decades.
Mimicking women is so effective that humans are often entirely deceived by sex mimicry. It needs to be taught to be recognized as deception in school, medicine, law, sports, and politics. Once recognized, then avoided.
In fact, the deception achieved by “ sex mimicking “ is the result of the conscious decision to become offended by truth ( and therefore collude with social activism) rather than to become offended by lies. The expression of the latter choice brings the real risks of being labeled as a transphobic bigot, at best, or suffer significant career retribution at worst ( just ask Jillian Spent) . My point being we are innately “ wired” to recognize the mimicking on just looking and listening, we then decide how to respond. The protagonists ( of gender identity/ fluidity) who are offended by truth, can only be guided by two motives, either misguided/ misplaced compassion, or deliberate social activism , for which there has been no shortage of expression of the latter from , inexplicably, medically trained folk who have nailed there empathetic colors to a mast , one which has been constructed deep in the bowels of gender studies within the social sciences
I agree wholeheartedly in many cases with you, but part of the art of deception is also to induce you to question yourself and make an effort.
It’s less effort and often unconscious, to overlook the deception. You are a student of people clearly and know most people simply accept what they are told.
Sexual mimicry has become so powerful that non-mimics tell People it’s not mimicry.
Classic sort of Emperor’s new clothes, or folie à plusieurs.
If it weren’t terrible in effect it would be humorous. It’s like looking at someone with a beard and saying “no they don’t have a beard”, or someone who was morbidly obese and saying “they are slender.”
It’s training. Some people are trained to reflexively say “that’s a woman” when they see a man, that like other cognitive reflexes, they don’t consider what’s been said l.
If someone is in a hospital bed on life support and half their body removed, they may reflexively say “I’m fine” when posed “how are you.”
“Let’s do lunch”, “I don’t need to write it down,” “No I’m not mad”, “honest politician”, “unbiased media”, “user friendly”. “Open secret”.
“I’m sorry you feel that way”.
Then
“Trans women are women”.
Social-smoothing, status-affirming nonsense.
For some reason my entire family loves nonsense phrases and usually responds in a way which interrupts the script.
“I feel like shit.” “I’m mad as hell.” “If you don’t like it tough shit”, and
“That’s not a woman that a butt-ugly delusional man.”
Since childhood.
Spencer
BUYER BEWARE
The ‘identity breakdown’ of transgender adults according to the ‘Williams Institute’ study in the US indicates is that there exists an approximate three-way near-equal split between ‘women’, ‘men’ and ‘binary’. Perhaps the situation is similar in Australia?
This equation is important as there are significantly elevated risk realities associating with the transgender women cohort for two reasons:
A high prevalence of sexually transmitted conditions and criminal activity:
1. Numerous studies confirm that TG women have high prevalence of HIV/AIDS. I cannot find current figures for HIV prevalence in this cohort in Australia however a study in 2018 indicated that the prevalence of HIV among the TG women cohort was 49 times that of the general population. In the United States HIV prevalence is highest among transgender women with recent estimates ranging from 14.1% to 18.8%.
2. I found it difficult to find recent figures for bacterial sexually transmitted diseases in this cohort however a study from 2017 indicated the following prevalences: Chlamydia 10%, Gonorrhoea 8% and Syphilis 3.1%
Criminal Activity:
Transgender women were over six times more likely to be convicted of an offence than female comparators and 18 times more likely to be convicted of a violent offence. Finally, as might be expected, studies imply that gender women exhibit a male-type patterns of criminality.
Dr Anastasia Tomson said: “In testing new agents or existing drugs that have never been applied to TB before, we don’t compare them to a placebo or to non-intervention, because we know it’s unethical. We know that we can’t withhold treatment in the name of building a body of evidence.”
This shows the extreme ignorance of this TransGender Doctor activist.
Of course we would not test a new TB treatment that had not been tested in TB before, in a randomised controlled trial. The new treatment would need to have shown efficacy in Phase 2 (uncontrolled) trials presumably after failure of the known effective treatment prior to progressing to a controlled trial.
This is completely different to medical affirmation, where there is no evidence of efficacy and proven evidence of harm.
You would expect overwhelming efficacy evidence to justify
treatment that causes irreversible body changes plus other risks such as osteoporosis.
But the protagonists can’t even agree on what the efficacy end point is. They have now virtually conceded that it doesn’t improve mental health, so now they say that as long as the patients achieve their wish, that is proof of efficacy.
If this is medicine it is certainly not the medicine I was taught.
Perhaps there is a level of desperation in South Africa in the face of multiple chronic illnesses?