Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guy van Hazel's avatar

Regarding the Californian law suits;

“The plaintiffs include Cameron, a 12-year-old “non-binary” boy, who was receiving the “medically necessary care” that the White House order would prohibit. The claim is that from the age of four “Cameron communicated to their parents that they were neither a boy nor a girl.”

So this seems a simple problem. If Cameron does not know he is a boy or a girl why not leave him as a boy. Surely this would be better than starting him on a lifelong regime of puberty blockers then oestrogen and finally castration and penectomy only for him to find at the end of that that maybe he was a boy after all.

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

So cutting off breasts is not regarded as dangerous and in the end heart breaking as theses females will not be able to breast feed their babies if they are ever able to reproduce. This is all so heartbreaking.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts