Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ollie Parks's avatar

Richard Levine has no business making decisions on, or otherwise becoming involved with, trans issues, especially youth gender medicine. As a man who claims to be a woman, he has an irremediable conflict of interest that precludes his participation. It is already well known that gender affirming physicians have breached or are at risk of breaching their ethical obligation to do no harm. Richard Levine cannot be counted upon to act in the patient's best interests when those interests conflict with the aims of gender identity ideology.

In a separate vein, I have been struck recently by the realization that our institutions, including ones such as legislative and executive bodies, which are governed according to democratic principles, embraced and implemented applied gender identity ideology without adequate free and open public debate and public approval. It seems as if gender identity ideology arrived on the scene with a predetermined cast of heroes and enemies and a list of preconceptions that precluded free and open public debate. From the outset it wasn't a question whether schools, city councils, health care organizations, businesses and the rest would accept the attitudes, beliefs and practices that flow from gender ideology but when and how rapidly.

Hence, comments such as this one, which is quoted in this essay, do not come as a surprise:

"“The fact that the law and medicine of all professions fell to this [gender ideology] is utterly shameful because they of all professions have their fundamental ethical foundation based upon evidence, so I think we should be afraid at how quickly and how far they fell… The only parallel I can think of is the satanic ritual abuse panic but even that did not have the worldwide scope of contagion and reach of gender identity [ideology]… [This swift and near complete institutional capture] should never have happened in the first place… "

Am I missing anything in my assessment of how gender ideology suddenly came to be everywhere all at once?

By now those institutions are fortresses that protect gender ideology from its critics. There seems to be no way for sex realists even to get a hearing. We've seen how trans allies in at least one medical association have manipulated the rules of governance to block sex realists from making their case to the membership. A judge hearing a challenge to the participation of boys who identify as girls in girls' sports has prohibited the girls' attorneys from referring to the boys as boys in his court room. I can't make any headway in my effort to make a health care organization stop reporting that I have a gender identity or that my sex was "assigned at birth." A queer reporter at The Washington Post recently misrepresented the case for banning boys from girls' teams egregiously.

I am better at describing problems than crafting solutions for them. I'm not convinced that exposing the public to the facts about the excesses of gender ideology activism will lead to reforms. What's certain is that gender identity ideology will only become more entrenched if we sex realists don't get the facts and the arguments against gender ideology before the public.

Expand full comment
for the kids's avatar

Thank you!

This is a great summary for those of us who could not attend! Also, it is great to have so many key points in one place to share.

For more about what happened at the aap with adm. Rachel Levine there is also a write up by Ben Ryan:

https://benryan.substack.com/p/stop-transing-gay-kids-biden-admin

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts