I think it was because his results were so good. Too good to be true that raised suspicions and a team of US researchers went to South Africa to inspect his data.
I doubt that this is necessary with the Dutch study as it has already been highly criticised.
The Bezwoda study was allegedly a randomized study but it turned out that many of his control patients were fraudulent.
The difference is that the Gender Physicians have not even needed a fraudulent study to promote the treatment. They are just going with a tiny uncontrolled and highly selected, highly criticised phase l/ll study and claiming “ the science is settled”.
I think it was because his results were so good. Too good to be true that raised suspicions and a team of US researchers went to South Africa to inspect his data.
I doubt that this is necessary with the Dutch study as it has already been highly criticised.
The Bezwoda study was allegedly a randomized study but it turned out that many of his control patients were fraudulent.
The difference is that the Gender Physicians have not even needed a fraudulent study to promote the treatment. They are just going with a tiny uncontrolled and highly selected, highly criticised phase l/ll study and claiming “ the science is settled”.