Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Hazel-rah's avatar

Yep. It's a problem as old as social science: the "best available" evidence is actually shit by any objective standard.

But social scientists and their ethics-challenged soulmates in trans medical science won't admit that, because it undermines the fundamental validity of their professions. So they grade themselves on a MASSIVE curve.

Not only did they have no control group and screened out all the kids with pre-existing co-morbidities and ran two simultaneous parallel treatments, but they blithely ignored the fact that long-term blocking of normal puberty had never been done on a meaningful scale before, and was experimental and risky to say the least, and designed no safeguards against or even protocols to assess potential negative effects. It was profoundly irresponsible.

Whoever approved and funded the study, whoever approved its publication, all have part of the blame aside from the main culprits whose names are on it.

Expand full comment
Vincent Keane's avatar

Virtually every principle enshrined in the practice of medicine to ensure safety and efficacy has been ignored in the in the evolving discipline of ‘gender medicine’

In any normal circumstance such ‘progress’ would demand cessation and accountability yet that is not so.

Somehow a notion as irrational as changing girls into boys and boys into girls has taken hold and seen as a logical next-step in that frontier where the rules don’t hold and the pursuit is noble.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts