That 2019 response from the RACP only gave a couple of options for those trying to understand such a position. Either those who have sought and obtained leadership positions which qualify them to be speaking on behalf of medical science ( as opposed to social science) have either undertaken some sort of parallel medical training, or ther…
That 2019 response from the RACP only gave a couple of options for those trying to understand such a position. Either those who have sought and obtained leadership positions which qualify them to be speaking on behalf of medical science ( as opposed to social science) have either undertaken some sort of parallel medical training, or there are darker , overtly “politically correct “ reasons , in supporting gender identity ideology, which doesn’t bear contemplation , for it to come from an ostensibly impeccable scientific source. We are indeed in trouble
That 2019 response from the RACP only gave a couple of options for those trying to understand such a position. Either those who have sought and obtained leadership positions which qualify them to be speaking on behalf of medical science ( as opposed to social science) have either undertaken some sort of parallel medical training, or there are darker , overtly “politically correct “ reasons , in supporting gender identity ideology, which doesn’t bear contemplation , for it to come from an ostensibly impeccable scientific source. We are indeed in trouble