The Lulu government has demonstrated good judgement in keeping with the global trend. Multiple nations known for their high standard of health services including the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway and 25 States in the US have backtracked on the provision of the ‘Affirmative Model of Gender Care’, including the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway and 25 States in the US and there can be little doubt that the trend will continue.
It's a shame that only the threat of legal liability was able to bring about a more cautious approach to the medicalization of gender distress. The probability of real harm to minors didn't seem to be much of an incentive -- it's only the possibility of being sued that caught the attention of government officials.
I always knew the threat of litigation would be the only way this insane trend would be brought down. Medicine doesn’t have a good track record when it comes to recognising its own mistakes voluntarily.
The Lulu government has demonstrated good judgement in keeping with the global trend. Multiple nations known for their high standard of health services including the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway and 25 States in the US have backtracked on the provision of the ‘Affirmative Model of Gender Care’, including the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway and 25 States in the US and there can be little doubt that the trend will continue.
Good call Brazil!
It's a shame that only the threat of legal liability was able to bring about a more cautious approach to the medicalization of gender distress. The probability of real harm to minors didn't seem to be much of an incentive -- it's only the possibility of being sued that caught the attention of government officials.
I always knew the threat of litigation would be the only way this insane trend would be brought down. Medicine doesn’t have a good track record when it comes to recognising its own mistakes voluntarily.
Whoops - apologies for the duplication in my post below