Queer theory is at the heart of gender identity ideology and the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors it has fostered.
I argue that Queer theory is not concerned with existing forms of human behavior, such as same-sex attraction. Same-sex attraction has existed for thousands of years, long before any legitimate scientific study of the phenomenon.
In contrast, the modern trans phenomenon would not exist as we know it today without Queer theory. This is because Queer theory is not designed to help trans people navigate a world that already recognizes their existence. Instead, it serves as an instruction manual for entirely new ways of thinking and being—ones without historical precedent. As ChatGPT describes it, Queer theory is "a body of intellectual work that challenges normative assumptions about gender and sexuality, particularly those rooted in heteronormativity and the binary view of sex and gender."
Put another way, the founders of Queer theory—"scholars with backgrounds in sociology, philosophy, law, literature or other humanities"—did not merely seek to analyze gender and sexuality. By constructing Queer theory from the ground up, they actively picked a fight with institutions, beliefs, and behaviors that have been fundamental to human cultures throughout history. What else is meant by the confession that “Queer theory seeks to disrupt dominant and normalizing binaries that structure our understandings of gender and sexuality"? How dare they?
There is a practical reason so many "[s]chool children are being taught in sex education classes that it is possible the doctor made a mistake, and they may not be the sex they thought they were. They are told there are more than two sexes." Without this indoctrination—and the widespread belief in gender identity theory that enables it—children would never arrive at the ABCs of gender ideology on their own.
Left to develop naturally, young people’s essential sexual orientation would begin to emerge with puberty, without any external prompting. As hormones take effect, aspects of teen culture that once seemed baffling would start to make sense.
And, quite separately, some young men might find that their burgeoning fascination with many material and behavioral manifestations of the feminine leads them to fantasize that they are themselves women. That is pretty much all trans would amount to today if Queer theory hadn't escaped from the Pandora's Box of academia and into the nurturing medium of progressive culture.
All health professionals need to do be able to ignore the risks of rights-driven medicine and the trans suicide narrative is to come together with other sex-realist/ gender-critical people and activists to expose the synthetic and pernicious nature of gender ideology.
An ABC article from May 24th 2021 praised Dr Michelle Telfer “for saving the lives of hundreds, even thousands of children – without ‘ever picking up a scalpel or treating a disease” is obviously nonsense and not particularly surprising given the ABC’s commitment to factual reporting.
The fact that it was not widely refuted by the physician mentioned says a lot.
Queer theory is at the heart of gender identity ideology and the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors it has fostered.
I argue that Queer theory is not concerned with existing forms of human behavior, such as same-sex attraction. Same-sex attraction has existed for thousands of years, long before any legitimate scientific study of the phenomenon.
In contrast, the modern trans phenomenon would not exist as we know it today without Queer theory. This is because Queer theory is not designed to help trans people navigate a world that already recognizes their existence. Instead, it serves as an instruction manual for entirely new ways of thinking and being—ones without historical precedent. As ChatGPT describes it, Queer theory is "a body of intellectual work that challenges normative assumptions about gender and sexuality, particularly those rooted in heteronormativity and the binary view of sex and gender."
Put another way, the founders of Queer theory—"scholars with backgrounds in sociology, philosophy, law, literature or other humanities"—did not merely seek to analyze gender and sexuality. By constructing Queer theory from the ground up, they actively picked a fight with institutions, beliefs, and behaviors that have been fundamental to human cultures throughout history. What else is meant by the confession that “Queer theory seeks to disrupt dominant and normalizing binaries that structure our understandings of gender and sexuality"? How dare they?
There is a practical reason so many "[s]chool children are being taught in sex education classes that it is possible the doctor made a mistake, and they may not be the sex they thought they were. They are told there are more than two sexes." Without this indoctrination—and the widespread belief in gender identity theory that enables it—children would never arrive at the ABCs of gender ideology on their own.
Left to develop naturally, young people’s essential sexual orientation would begin to emerge with puberty, without any external prompting. As hormones take effect, aspects of teen culture that once seemed baffling would start to make sense.
And, quite separately, some young men might find that their burgeoning fascination with many material and behavioral manifestations of the feminine leads them to fantasize that they are themselves women. That is pretty much all trans would amount to today if Queer theory hadn't escaped from the Pandora's Box of academia and into the nurturing medium of progressive culture.
All health professionals need to do be able to ignore the risks of rights-driven medicine and the trans suicide narrative is to come together with other sex-realist/ gender-critical people and activists to expose the synthetic and pernicious nature of gender ideology.
An ABC article from May 24th 2021 praised Dr Michelle Telfer “for saving the lives of hundreds, even thousands of children – without ‘ever picking up a scalpel or treating a disease” is obviously nonsense and not particularly surprising given the ABC’s commitment to factual reporting.
The fact that it was not widely refuted by the physician mentioned says a lot.