WHAT MOST OF THE WORLD THINKS OF THE USE OF PUBERTY BLOCKERS IN CHILDREN
The World Health Organisation clarifies that “gender-affirmative care” is not supported by evidence in children and adolescents, UN Women have welcomed the Cass Report.
The following countries do not allow the use of puberty blockers in children:
Austria, Canada, Croatia, Bulgaria, Denmark, England, Finland, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Northern Ireland, Norway, Portugal, Scotland, Sweden and 25 States in the US have banned the use of puberty blockers.
The Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne: Puberty blockers suppress the development of secondary sex characteristics and are used for adolescents in the early stages of pubertal development.
The ’Law of Holes’ has stood the test of time and is something that we are well advised to respect and abide by. There can be few examples more appropriate of this end than the case of the practitioners implementing the affirmative model of gender care:
The sole dissent sounds like a parody of Maslow's humanistic psychology. I could not make heads nor tails of it; it is word salad with a WPATH dressing. Hopefully legislators and medical practitioners will see the irrationality of the dissent and opt for evidence and logic.
WHAT MOST OF THE WORLD THINKS OF THE USE OF PUBERTY BLOCKERS IN CHILDREN
The World Health Organisation clarifies that “gender-affirmative care” is not supported by evidence in children and adolescents, UN Women have welcomed the Cass Report.
The following countries do not allow the use of puberty blockers in children:
Austria, Canada, Croatia, Bulgaria, Denmark, England, Finland, Germany, Holland, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Northern Ireland, Norway, Portugal, Scotland, Sweden and 25 States in the US have banned the use of puberty blockers.
The Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne: Puberty blockers suppress the development of secondary sex characteristics and are used for adolescents in the early stages of pubertal development.
The ’Law of Holes’ has stood the test of time and is something that we are well advised to respect and abide by. There can be few examples more appropriate of this end than the case of the practitioners implementing the affirmative model of gender care:
When you’re in a hole stop digging!
The medical people are just groping in the dark.
The sole dissent sounds like a parody of Maslow's humanistic psychology. I could not make heads nor tails of it; it is word salad with a WPATH dressing. Hopefully legislators and medical practitioners will see the irrationality of the dissent and opt for evidence and logic.
Excellent critique of the use of PBs.
(Don't try posting anything like that on BlueSky; they hang critics of gender ideology there!)