Discussion about this post

User's avatar
dd's avatar

The NYTimes had a long article today about Jamie Reed and the clinic she worked for that is a must read.....This is an archive copy so anyone should be able to open it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230824005800/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/23/health/transgender-youth-st-louis-jamie-reed.html

And this twitter thread leads to an article listing number of procedures regarding "gender affirming care" surgeries, etc. Regarding the report, take special note of the number and type of hospital/clinic included....I think there is very likely and undercount.

https://twitter.com/benryanwriter/status/1694363996613161247

Expand full comment
Vincent Keane's avatar

My conviction is that the end-end point of the ‘affirmative model/debacle’ will be a shameful awakening and realisation that ‘we were wrong’. Of course the irreparable damage done will remain.

It will not be the first time that lessons learned will have been ignored by the zealots ‘who know’.

I cite a recent example:

In 1998 The Australian Medical Association (AMA) marketed the Intravaginal Sling Tunneller device as an “Australian medical design breakthrough” to treat incontinence and prolapse in women, a condition that can follow pregnancy. The device did not undergo a trial to confirm safety and efficacy and resulted in a litany of dreadful irreversable complications including: dyspareunia, intractable pain, incontinence, infection, systemic autoimmune conditions, organ perforation and invasion of the vaginal wall.

The device was withdrawn by the TGA in 2018.

Thousands of women globally were irreversibly damaged with legal payouts to the tune of US$8 billion.

“I can only answer that in good faith we thought it was a good idea”

Dr Michael Gannon (then President of the AMA)

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts